SIEP publications are protected by copyright and all rights are reserved. SIEP publications may not be reproduced in any form or by any means without written permission from the copyright owner. This includes the posting of electronic files on the Internet, transferring electronic files to other persons, distributing printed output, and photocopying. Requests for authorization to make photocopies should be directed to: SIEP, 1697 Lark Lane, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003-3157 Tel: (856) 429 2699, Fax: (856) 429 7414, Email: barnea@earlypregnancy.org
![]() |
EARLY
PREGNANCY: Biology and Medicine Editor-in-Chief: Eytan R. Barnea MD, FACOG |
July 2001
Volume V, Number 3
ISSN: 1537-6583
Pages: 153-163
M. Daniely, A. Aviram, H.J.A. Carp, R. Shaki, G. Barkai
The Institute of Human Genetics, & Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
Objective
To determine whether there is a correlation between the proportion of aneuploid cells
in peripheral lymphocytes and the karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage.
Methods
Chromosomal analysis was performed using G-banding with trypsin-Giemsa in parental peripheral blood and in the abortus.
Results
Conclusion
Introduction
Recurrent spontaneous miscarriages affects up to 1 percent of the population (Salat-Baroux, 1988), with approximately 90% presenting as missed abortions in the first trimester, (Carp et al, 1988). Numerous factors have been described as associations with spontaneous abortions such as :- uterine abnormalities, endocrinological imbalance, immunological factors, infectious diseases and specific genetic factors (ETEP, 1995, Wheeler, 1991). Chromosomal abberations such as aneuploidy account for approximately 50% of sporadic fetal losses prior to 15 weeks (Abruzzo & Hassold, 1995, Byrne & Ward, 1994). Most cases of aneuploidy arise from nondisjunction at meiosis in one of the parents, leading to an abnormal gamete (Chandley, 1982). Other chromosomal abnormalities such as centromere abnormalities may also predispose to meiotic non-disjunction leading to abortion (Bajnoczky & Gardo, 1993). It is accepted that a balanced translocation carried by one of the parents, can cause repeat spontaneous abortion. Additionally, a balanced translocation occurs in one of the parents of 2-3%of couples who have experienced 2 or more pregnancy losses (Byrne & Ward, 1994).
There are three major types of numerical chromosomal aberations found in the abortus:
1) Complete numerical abnormality (i.e., trisomies, monosomies, triploidies etc.), accounting for approximately 95% of the chromosome abnormalities involved in fetal demise (Warburton, 1987). Numerical abnormalities could result from abnormal meiosis.
2) Mosaicism which could result from one of two mechanisms: a) mitotic nondisjunction in a chromosomally normal conceptus or, b) a meiotic error Most mosaics may originate from trisomic conceptions (Hassold, 1982, Kalousek et al, 1993).
3) An increased proportion of sporadic aneuploid cells due to mitotic non disjunction during fetal development, which could be influenced by the maternal hormonal profile. The estrogen/progesterone balance may influence lymphocyte proliferation and mitotic behavior (Horsman, 1987).
Some couples with habitual abortion, have an increased proportion of aneuploid cells in their peripheral blood lymphocytes (Hecht et al, 1984, Staessen et al, 1983, Juberg et al, 1985). Some studies have described increased sex chromosome aneuploidy in couples with recurrent abortions (Hecht, 1982, Holzgreve et al, 1984, Horsman et al, 1987). An increased proportion of aneuploid somatic cells in otherwise normal individuals, could indicate mitotic instability (Juberg et al, 1985).
Little is known about the cause of meiotic nondisjunction that results in aneuploid conception (Abruzzo & Hassold, 1995). Errors of chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis, may possibly be due to spindle defects (Staessen et al, 1983). Mitosis and meiosis may share other common genetic control mechanisms. Therefore, aneuploidy in lymphocytes from a parent with recurrent spontaneous abortion, could conceivably indicate an increased tendency to chromosomal aberrations which are usually considered to be random events (Hecht et al, 1984).
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether, a correlation exists between the rate of aneuploidy in parental peripheral lymphocytes and the karyotype of the abortus in recurrently aborting couples.
Materials and MethodsStudy Population
From January to December 1996, 300 women with spontaneous abortions were assessed at the
department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Sheba medical center. Fourty couples with
the following criteria, were selected to participate in this study:
1) a history two or more pregnancy losses. 2) successful karyotyping of at least one of the previous missed abortions 3) no known etiology to account for miscarriages.
Cytogenetic studies were performed on the lymphocytes of both parents and the tissue culture of their abortuses. The couples were classified into two groups according to the proportion of aneuploid cells in the abortus:
Group No. 1 comprised of couples with an increased proportion of chromosomally abnormal cells in the abortus, i.e. trisomy, monosomy, polyploidy, mosaicism, and an increased proportion (over 10%) of cells with a non-specific abnormal chromosome constitution. Group No. 2 comprised of couples in which karyotyping of the embryonic tissue revealed a normal karyotype with no more than a few sporadic chromosomally abnormal cells.
As there are factors associated with parental gender (such as differences in the hormonal milieu) affecting the aneuploidy rate in somatic cells, these two groups were further subdivided into male and female groups. Statistical analyses were carried out separately for men and women respectively.
Tissue Culture
Tissue samples were obtained from the abortuses. The samples were cultured directly on
coverslips in petri dishes containing 5ml RPMI medium supplemented
with 20% FCS, 1% streptomycin/penicillin and 1% glutamine. Colchicine was added 2 hours before the cytological preparation. For chromosome analysis the
samples were processed using standard techniques. All specimens were G-banded using
trypsin-Giemsa in order to analyze and identify abnormalities in the cells. A minimum of
15 cells were scored, and at least 5 cells were analyzed while the others were counted.
Lymphocyte culture
Peripheral blood samples were collected into sterile heparinized tubes. Blood lymphocytes
were cultured for 3 days. The lymphocytes were stimulated by phytohemaglutinine. The cells
were harvested by adding colchicine 1 hour before the cytological
preparation.
Metaphase chromosomes were obtained using standard techniques. Metaphases were prepared for cytogenetic analysis with trypsin-Giemsa banding. Sixty metaphase cells were analyzed microscopically for their chromosome constitution. Each chromosome was analyzed for its presence. Aneuploidy was determined by the number of hypo and hyperploid cells in the examined slide.
Statistical Analysis
The mean frequency of aneuploidy was compared in the different groups using the t-test.
The Pearson (Chi squared) test was used in order to determine the correlation between the
rate of aneuploidy in parental lymphocytes and the karyotype of the abortuses.
Table I plots the overall data and shows the aneuploidy rates, age of the parents and the chromosomal findings in the abortus.
Abortus
Of the 40 abortuses examined, 20 revealed a chromosomally unbalanced karyotype, including
seven trisomies, four mosaics, two triploidies, and seven cases with an increased
proportion (over 10%) of sporadic aneuploid cells. In addition, four unbalanced structural
chromosomal rearrangements were found. These four cases were excluded from the study
because of balanced chromosomal rearrangements that were carried by one of the parents.
Parents
Group no. 1 (with an increased proportion of chromosomally abnormal cells in the
peripheral lymphocytes,) included twenty couples (Nos.1-20). 13 of these couples (65%),
showed an increased proportion (over 10%) of aneuploid cells in their lymphocytes. This
was found predominantly in the female partner, and less often in the males. Their
abortuses revealed trisomies, mosaicism, and high proportion of sporadic aneuploid cells (Table I).
However, only two of the 16 couples in group No. 2 (couples no. 21-36), revealed an increased proportion of aneuploid cells. The others showed low aneuploidy rates.
The women
The mean incidence of aneuploidy in the lymphocytes, within the two groups of women are
presented in Table II. Group No. 1 showed a
statistically significant increased proportion of aneuploid cells compared to group No. 2.
The mean values of hypo and hyperploid cells found in the two groups of women was also
significantly higher in group no 1.
A significant correlation (P<0.005) was found between the proportion of aneuploid cells in the abortus and the proportion of aneuploid cells in the somatic cells of the mothers. There was no significant difference in the mean age of the women in the two groups. Additionally, no statistically significant correlation was found between the age of the women and the proportion of aneuploid cells found in their lymphocytes (P<0.05)
The men
The mean incidence of aneuploidy in the lymphocytes of the two groups of men is summarized
in Table III. The only significant difference was in
the proportion of hyperploid cells in both groups. No significant correlation was found
between the proportion of aneuploid cells in the abortus and that of the aneuploid cells
in the lymphocytes of the corresponding fathers. Also, there was no statistically
significant correlation between the age of the men and the proportion of aneuploid cells
in their lymphocytes (P<0.1)
Chromosome abnormalities (mostly aneuploidy) account for approximately 50% of fetal losses between 8 to 15 weeks (Byrne & Ward, 1994). Most aneuploid conceptuses arise from non-disjunction at meiosis (Chandley AC, 1982). The results indicate that recurrently aborting couples who abort chromosomally abnormal fetuses, have an increased proportion of aneuploid cells in their lymphocytes. These data concur with other reports in the literature (Hecht et al, 1984, Holzgreve et al, 1984, Horsman et al, 1987, Staessen et al, 1983). The increased proportion of sporadic aneuploid cells was found predominantly in the mothers. A significant correlation was found between the proportion of aneuploid cells found in maternal lymphocytes and the proportion of aneuploid cells in the abortus. Numerous studies have been performed on the karyotype of the abortus. Some have documented a low frequency of x hyperploid cells in the lymphocyte culture of few of these patients (Castle & Bernstein, 1988, Houser & Pai, 1984, Mayers et al, 1986). Although we have also noticed a high incidence of x hyperploid cells, we have found other chromosomes to also be involved in the errors of non disjunction.
Our data support the hypothesis that parental somatic non disjunction and the proportion of aneuploid cells in the abortus are interrelated. Factors leading to mitotic instability in cultured lymphocytes may indicate a predisposition to abnormal changes during meiosis. As meiosis and mitosis use the same mechanism of chromosomal segregation, in which the chromosomes migrate to the opposite poles using the spindle fibers and the centromers, it is possible that these factors cause abnormal spindle assembly and function (Staessen et al, 1983). Moreover, these factors may be serologically determined, and could interfere with the division of fetal somatic cells in the uterus. This mechanism could be responsible for abortuses with an increased proportion of sporadic aneuploid cells.
The paternal contribution to fetal aneuploidy is less clear. It seems that the proportion of aneuploid cell in men is not a reliable indicator of the tendency to meiotic and somatic non disjunction. Most chromosomally unbalanced abortions are the result of maternal non disjunction (Hassold et al, 1984, Meulenbbroek & Geraedts , 1982).
Among the individuals with a high proportion of sporadic aneuploid cells in their lymphocytes, 65% were women. Previous studies have estimated that maternal first meiotic division errors predominate for all trisomies studied irrespective of maternal age (Hassold et al, 1983). It has been shown that during meiosis, 62% of non disjunction events occur as a result of an error in the first maternal meiotic division, 15% in the second maternal meiotic division, 12% in the first paternal meiotic division, and 11% in the second paternal meiotic division (Staessen et al, 1983). We assumed a correlation between the proportion of somatic aneuploid cells of the parent and that of the fetus, hence we expecteded that somatic aneuploid cells would be found predominantly in women.
It has been reported that the aneuploid cells in lymphocyte culture are due to the random loss or gain of chromosomes during preparation of the cells for cytogenetic analysis. In this study, the cells were blindly scored for the frequency of aneuploidy, therefore if the presence of aneuploid cells was an artifact, it should have occured equally in both groups. Furthermore, an artifact does not usually produce hyperploid cells. The statistically significant difference found in the proportion of hyperploid cells between the two groups of women and in the men, strongly argues against this theory. Furthermore, an artifact does not usually produce hyperploid cells. Another study which tried to overcome these technical problems by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in order to determine chromosome hypoploidy (Guttenbach et al, 1995), also reports on hypoploidy in both autosomes and sex chromosomes.
Advancing parental age has been recognized as a contributing factor, increasing the risk of producing aneuploid gametes. Some studies have also found an age correlated increase in the proportion of aneuploid cells in the lymphocytes (Galloway et al, 1978). It has been shown that in women, there is an increase in the rate of somatic aneuploidy between the ages of 45 and 64. In males, the rate of aneuploidy increases significantly after the age of 55. The individuals participating in this study were much younger, therefore we assumed that this study population was not affected by age.
The increased proportion of aneuploidy in lymphocytes could have been related to the levels of estrogen in the patient's serum. The estrogen to progesterone ratio at the time of blood sampling may influence lymphocyte proliferation and mitotic behavior (Horsman et al, 1987). In order to minimize the differences in aneuploidy rate associated with the hormonal profile, men and women were assessed separately.
From our results it seems that couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions whose lymphocyte cultures revealed an increased proportion of sporadic aneuploid cells, may constitute a sub-population among all couples with reproductive wastage who may be at increased risk for chromosomally unbalanced offspring as a result of meiotic non disjunction or somatic non disjunction in fetal cell division. Consequently, we believe that these couples would benefit from prenatal diagnosis and appropriate counseling, regardless of their age.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from SIEP.
Abruzzo MA, Hassold TJ (1995): Etiology of nondisjunction in humans. Environ Mol Mutagen (supll) 26, 38-47
Bajnoczky K, Gardo S (1993): "Premature anaphase" in a couple with recurrent miscarriages. Hum Genet 92, 388-390
Boue A, Boue J (1985): Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage. Adv Hum Genet, 14, 1-57
Byrne JLB, Ward K (1994): Genetic factors in recurrent abortion. Clin Obstet Gynecol 37, 693-704
Carp HJA, Toder V, Gazi, E, Orgad S, Mashiach S, Serr DM, Nebel L. (1988) Paternal leucocyte immunization and habitual abortion. Contemp Rev Obst Gynecol 1, 49-59
Castle D, Bernstein R (1988): Cytogenetics of 688 couples experiencing multiple spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 29, 549-556
Chandley AC (1982): The origin of aneuploidy. In "human genetics, Part B: Medical aspects". New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 337-347.
ETEP (1995) Euro-Team Early Pregnancy (ETEP) protocol for recurrent miscarriage. Human Reproduction 10, 1516-1520
Galloway SM, Buckton KE (1978): Aneuploidy and ageing: Chromosome studies on a random sample of the population using G-banding. Cytogenet cell Genet 20, 78-95
Guttenbach M, Koschorz B, Bernthaler U, Grimm T, Schmidt M (1995): Sex chromosome loss and aging: in situ hybridization studies on human interphase nuclei. Am J Hum Genet 57, 1143-1150
Hassold TJ (1982): Mosaic trisomies in human spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 61, 31-35
Hassold TJ, Quillen SD, Yamane JA (1983): Sex ratio in spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 47, 39-47
Hassold TJ, Chiu D, Yamane JA (1984): Parental origin of autosomal trisomies. Ann Hum Genet 48, 120-144
Hecht P (1982): Unexpected encounters in cytogenetics: Repeated abortions and parental sex chromosome mosaicism may indicate risk of nondisjunction. Am J Hum Genet 34, 514-516
Hecht P, Hecht BK, Berger CS (1984): Aneuploidy in recurrent spontaneous aborters: The tendency to parental nondisjunction. Clin Genet 26, 43-45
Holzgreve W, Schonberg SA, Douglas RG, Golbus MS (1984): X-chromosome hyperploidy in couples with multiple spontaneous abortions. Obstet Gynecol 63, 237-240
Horsman DE, Dill FJ, McGillivary BC, Kalousek DK (1987): X-chromosome aneuploidy in lymphocyte culture from women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 28, 81-987
Houser P, Pai GS (1984) A prospective study of low frequency x-chromosome aneuploidy in women with multiple reproductive mishaps. Am J Hum Genet 36, 96S (Abst 281)
Juberg RC, Knops J, Mowrey PN (1985): Increased frequency of lymphocytic mitotic non-disjunction in recurrent spontaneous aborters. J Med Genet 22, 32-35
Kalousek DK, Langlois S, Barret I, Yam I, Wilson DR, Howard-Peebles PN, Johnson MP, Giorgiuttiss E (1993): Am J Hum Genet 52, 8-16
Meulenbbroek GH, Geraedts JP (1982): Parental origin of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 47, 39-47
Meyers CM, Simpson JL, Martin AO, Elias S (1986): Hypermodal cells, hypomodal cells, and reptitive abortions. Fertil Steril 46, 615-618
Salat-Baroux J. (1988). Recurrent spontaneous abortions. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 28, 1555-1568
Staessen C, Maes AM, Kirch-Volders M, Susanne C (1983): Is there a prediposition for meiotic nondisjunction that may be detected by mitotic instability?. Clin Genet 24, 184-190
Warburton D (1987): Chromosomal causes of fetal death. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30, 268-277
Wheeler JM. (1991) Epidemiologic aspects of recurrent pregnancy loss. Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am 2, 1-17
Details of Patients included in the study
| No. | Karyotype of Abortus | % Aneuploidy in Abortus | Maternal age | % Aneuploidy in Mother | Paternal age | % Aneuploidy in Father |
| 1 | 47,XX+16 | 100% | 29 | 18% | 36 | 13% |
| 2 | 47,XY+7 | 100% | 27 | 18.18% | 30 | 2.2% |
| 3 | 48,XX+20+21 | 100% | 39 | 10% | 40 | 0% |
| 4 | 47,XX+14 | 100% | 40 | 15% | 46 | 1.85% |
| 5 | 69,XXX | 100% | 29 | 5.4% | 34 | 4.28% |
| 6 | 47,XX+12 | 100% | 37 | 11.66% | 45 | 8.33% |
| 7 | 47,XX+13 | 100% | 27 | 18.2% | 30 | 2.2% |
| 8 | 45,XX-4/47,XX+16 | 100% | 30 | 8.33% | 33 | 9.45% |
| 9 | 46,XY(t13;14) | 100% | 35 | 0% | 35 | 20% |
| 10 | 69XXY | 100% | 29 | 3.33% | 32 | 1.66% |
| 11 | 46,XY/47,XY+13 | 54.5% | 41 | 3.7% | 44 | 1.66% |
| 12 | 46,XX/47,XX+16 | 51.5% | 28 | 6.66% | 30 | 8.33% |
| 13 | 46,XX/47,XX+15 | 42.85% | 34 | 12.72% | 35 | 11.11% |
| 14 | 46,XX | 41.66% | 37 | 10% | 40 | 18.33% |
| 15 | 46,XX | 31.25% | 35 | 13.33% | 41 | 5.76% |
| 16 | 46,XY | 28.5% | 36 | 3.3% | 34 | 8.3% |
| 17 | 46,XX | 18.5% | 28 | 11.66% | 31 | 8.9% |
| 18 | 46,XY | 15.78% | 30 | 10% | 32 | 0% |
| 19 | 46,XX | 15.38% | 28 | 6.66% | 30 | 8.33% |
| 20 | 46,XX | 11.11% | 30 | 13.33% | 33 | 5.66% |
| 21 | 46,XX | 7.6% | 29 | 8.3% | 31 | 7% |
| 22 | 46,XY | 7.14% | 34 | 0% | 38 | 0% |
| 23 | 46,XX | 6.66% | 25 | 3.57% | 28 | 5.5% |
| 24 | 46,XX | 6.6% | 28 | 6.6% | 28 | 3.3% |
| 25 | 46,XX | 5.8% | 33 | 1.69% | 37 | 8.33% |
| 26 | 46,XX | 5.2% | 35 | 5% | 37 | 8.33% |
| 27 | 46,XX | 3.57% | 22 | 3.33% | 27 | 0% |
| 28 | 46,XX | 0% | 29 | 10% | 34 | 10% |
| 29 | 46,XY | 0% | 36 | 3.3% | 34 | 8.3% |
| 30 | 46,XY | 0% | 37 | 0% | 43 | 0% |
| 31 | 46,XX | 0% | 36 | 0% | 38 | 2% |
| 32 | 46,XX | 0% | 30 | 0% | 33 | 0% |
| 33 | 46,XY | 0% | 33 | 7.27% | 38 | 4% |
| 34 | 46,XY | 0% | 33 | 3.33% | 29 | 3.33% |
| 35 | 46,XY | 0% | 37 | 6.66% | 34 | 11.66% |
| 36 | 46,XY | 0% | 33 | 6.66% | 39 | 1.66% |
| 37 | 46,XX,1q+ | 0% | 25 | 1.88% | 27 | 3.33% |
| 38 | 46,XX,t(Yq:18) | 0% | 29 | 3.3% | 33 | 0% |
| 39 | 46,XX,inv.2 | 0% | 35 | 0% | 35 | 0% |
| 40 | 46,XY,inv.2 | 0% | 32 | 1.66% | 35 | 0% |
Mean rate of aneuploidy in maternal lymphocytes for groups Nos. 1 and 2
| Group No. 1* Mean ± SD | Group No. 2** Mean ± SD |
|
|
| Rate of Aneuploidy |
|
|
|
| Rate Of Hyperploidy |
|
|
|
| Rate Of Hypoploidy |
|
|
|
* Group No. 1 refers to women with an increased proportion of chromosomally abnormal
cells in the abortus, n = 20 women, (60 cells per women).
** Group No. 2 refers to women in which karyotyping of the abortus revealed a normal
karyotype, n = 16 women, (60 cells per women).
Mean rate of aneuploidy in paternal lymphocytes for groups Nos. 1 and 2
| Group No. 1* Mean ± SD | Group No. 2** Mean ± SD |
|
|
| Rate of Aneuploidy |
|
|
|
| Rate Of Hyperploidy |
|
|
|
| Rate Of Hypoploidy |
|
|
|
* Group No. 1 refers to women with an increased proportion of chromosomally abnormal
cells in the abortus, n = 20 women, (60 cells per women).
** Group No. 2 refers to women in which karyotyping of the abortus revealed a normal
karyotype, n = 16 women, (60 cells per women).