![]() |
Fourth World Conference |
![]() |
| January 2001 Volume V, Number 1 ISSN: 1537-6583 Pages: 049-050 |
Pecs, Hungary June 1-3, 2000 |
Organized by: |
Hungarian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology SIEP, the Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy |
Presidents: |
Eytan R. BARNEA (USA) István SZABÓ (Hungary) |
Grzegorz H. Breborowicz
Department of Perinatology and Gynecology
University School of Medical Sciences Poznan, Poland
Presentation
According to Websters Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, viable of a fetus it means having reached such a stage of development as to be capable of living, under normal conditions, outside the uterus. Viability exists as a function of biomedical and technological capacities, which are different in different parts of the world. As a consequence, there is, at the present time, no worldwide, uniform gestational age that defines viability.
Viability is not an intrinsic property of the fetus because viability should be understood in terms of both biological and technological factors. It is only in virtue of both factors that a viable fetus can exist ex utero and thus later achieve independent moral status. Moreover, these two factors do not exist as a function of the autonomy of the pregnant woman. When a fetus is viable, that is, when it is of sufficient maturity so that it can survive into the neonatal period and later achieve independent moral status given the availability of the requisite technological support, and when it is presented to the physician, the fetus is a patient.
In the United States viability presently occurs at
approximately 24 weeks of gestational age (Chervenak, L.B. McCullough; Textbook of
Perinatal Medicine, 1998). In Portugal, the mortality increase significantly with GA<25
weeks. At 25 weeks mortality was 44.4% and at 26 weeks was 24.4% (I. Macedo et al.
Matemidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Lisbon, 2000). In Poland during last years we observe
also a very significant decrease of perinatal mortality.
There are several aspects of fetal viability: ethical, social, psychological and medical.
Ethical aspects
There is a compelling conceptual and clinical reason to reject Primum
non nocere as the primary principle of perinatal ethics; virtually all medical
interventions involve unavoidable risks of harm, for example, amniocentesis. If Primum
non nocere were to be made the primary principle of perinatal ethics, virtually all of
perinatal medicine would be unethical.
Social aspects
Greatly increased advances in perinatal medicine lead on one hand
to a high quality of care expected and demanded by both the health care professionals and
patients, but on the other hand the resources available for responding to the expectations
and demands are becoming increasingly stretched. Even in the high-income countries, the
available resources are scarce in relation to these demands a high quality of care
expected and demanded by both the health care professionals and patients, but on the other
hand the resources available for responding to the expectations and demands are becoming
increasingly stretched.
Medical aspects
During the preconceptional period the most important actions are: family
planning, education, analysis of previous obstetrical miscarriages and prevention of
congenital malformations (folic acid). Pregnancy presents several problems, which can
significantly influence fetal viability. Proper management of these problems can improve
perinatal outcome. Among others prevention of prematurity is the most important goal of
contemporary perinatal medicine.
Enhancement of fetal viability
There are several possibilities to enhance fetal viability. The
most important are: organization of perinatal care, introduction of new technologies to
perinatal medicine, intensive fetal therapy and early detection of fetal distress. Three
levels system of perinatal care, transport in utero, introduction and promotion of
new methods, continues education of staff are characteristic for the modern organization
of perinatal medicine. Echocardiography, Color Doppler Energy, 3D sonography,
prenatal diagnosis (cordocentesis, analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood,..), fetal
pulse oximetry, mathematical analysis of the signal are the methods which should be used
at the highest level of perinatal care.
Conclusion
Today, the prospect of survival is only about 1 in 10
at 23 weeks, and if the child lives it is more likely to be handicapped that not. At 24
weeks the chance of a normal survivor is about 50%, and after this the odds are in favor
of a normal survivor. Considering this data, intensive care should be an optional choice
for fetuses at 23 and 24 weeks of gestation and should be offered to every fetus at 25
weeks or more.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from SIEP.